Background Checks for Scientists

While many of you may not know this, background checks are routinely run on prospective new employees at most companies and organizatons before job offers are extended. Like it or not background checks are increasingly being run on scientists because of the US anthrax incident that occurred soon after September 11, 2001. I want to emphasize that background checks on being run on ALL employees (not only scientists) before being hired.

Guest blogger, Anne Stephanie Cruz of Crimcheck.com contacted me and offered to enlighten us about how background checks are conducted and the type of information that employers are seeking. Crimcheck.com provides background checks for businesses large and small nationwide. Crimcheck.com background checks include criminal history, education verification, employment verification, driving records and more.

The Expansion of Background Checks for Scientists

A series of events and the development of technology have changed the climate for employers wishing to do a background check on job candidates. With the heightened security requirements resulting from the threat of terrorism, background checks have become essential for many jobs in science. Many companies developed tight security including background checks years ago. For example, anyone entering a large chemical plant understands from the gates and security checks at each entrance that access to the facility has been tightly guarded for years. However, with the escalation of terrorism coupled with the ease of gathering information on a job candidate, even the smallest organizations are taking the opportunity to thoroughly check out their scientists before hiring them.

There has been much debate over this issue as long established procedures give way to tighter security measures. For example, after the contamination of letters with anthrax, some laboratories began to implement new security requirements for employees, including background checks of personal information as well as fingerprinting.

There are firm guidelines in the general population regarding the information that can be collected legally for an employment background check. Also, some information can be collected but not used to make a decision regarding employing a candidate, such as public bankruptcy information. However, federal rules have opened scientists up to closer scrutiny and allowed background checks to include more information.

Generally, the following information may be acquired during a background check:

The following are examples of information that cannot be included in a general employment background check:

  1. Records of Arrest
  2. Civil Court Records (after 7 years)

The use of information like bankruptcy, marital status, number of children, race, age, sex, religion, birth place, sexual orientation, living arrangements, or health is illegal in the hiring process for most professions. However, new rules have allowed scientists to be checked beyond these restrictions. For example, one rule had restricted citizens of countries suspected of supporting terrorism from working with certain dangerous biological agents.

Scientists were also restricted from some jobs based on a history of mental illness, felony convictions, or drug use. The sudden implementation of background checks and heightened security was particularly disturbing for many seasoned scientists who had been trusted employees for years. Privacy rights have been thrown aside in many cases, leading to a disturbance in the scientific community. Many lawsuits have sprung up as scientists scramble to protect their rights in this environment. Examples of organizations with widely known lawsuits over background checks include JPL and NASA.

The legal framework regarding background checks for scientists is constantly shifting. Scientists need to know that they are likely to be checked out thoroughly, not only when applying for a job, but throughout their career. Employers doing background checks should seriously consider hiring a reputable company to perform these checks in order to stay within the boundaries of privacy laws.

Until next time....

Good Luck and Good Job Hunting

 SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Can Scientists Be Effective CEOs?

Over the past 30 years or so, the vast majority of chief executives in the drug business have made their way to the top via the sales and marketing departments. Few senior executives have toiled in a research laboratory or for that matter, know the difference between NMR and protein purification. However, things may be changing in the industry. A quick perusal of the CEOs of the top 20 pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies (see below) reveals that 11 of 20 have degrees in engineering (4), medicine (2) and science (5). The remaining 9 have degrees in business and finance (3), sales and marketing (4) or law (2). Several of the scientists (2), engineers (3) and one physician also earned MBA degrees.

 

Conventional wisdom suggests that scientists usually do not make good CEOs (they are not formally trained in business). However, doesn’t the lack of scientific sensibility put non-scientist CEOs at a disadvantage when it comes to making strategic and operational decisions about R &D?  One would think so….!!!!

 

A careful examination of my top 20 list suggests that some of the most successful companies are run by scientist CEOs, e.g. Genentech, Gilead, Novartis and Lilly. Expect to see more scientist CEOs at large biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies in the future–R&D have become way too complex for non-scientist to truly understand its nuances and potential pitfalls. Plus, we scientists know that obtaining a MBA degree is a “piece of cake” as compared with the PhD degree! Hmmm, I wonder what business people think about PhDs?

Company

Name

Background

2006 Total Compensation

Abbott

Miles White

Mechanical Engineering and Business (MBA)

$26,915,358 

Amgen

Kevin Sharer

Aeronautical Engineering and Business (MBA)

$34,390,000

AstraZeneca

David Brennan

Sales and Marketing

$4,226,000 

Biogen/IDEC

James Mullen

Chemical Engineering

$1,450,000

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Jim Cornelius

Business (MBA) and Finance

$1,472,879

Eli Lilly

John Lechleiter

Chemistry (PhD)

Not available (newly appointed)

Genentech

Arthur D. Levinson

Molecular Biology (PhD)

$17,124,025 

Genzyme

Henri A. Termeer

Finance and Business (MBA)

$36,380,000

Gilead

John C. Martinis

Organic Chemistry (PhD), Chemical Engineering and Business (MBA)

$22,860,000

GlaxoSmithKline

JP Garnier

Pharmacology (PhD) and Business (MBA)

$5,413,000 

Johnson & Johnson

William C. Weldon

Sales and Marketing

$28,557,749 

MedImmune

David Mott

Banking and Investment

$11,411,897

Merck

Richard T. Clark

Business and Marketing (MBA)

$10,236,740

Millennium

Deborah Dunsire

Physician (MD)

$3,874,464

Novartis

Daniel Vasella

Physician (MD) and Business (MBA)

3,199,505 CHF

Pfizer

Jeffery Kindler

Lawyer

$9,799,233 

Roche

Severin Schwan

Lawyer and Finance

Not available (newly appointed)

Sanofi Aventis

Gerard Le Fur,

Pharmaceutical Sciences (PhD)

Not available (newly appointed)

Schering Plough

Fred Hassan

Chemical Engineering and Business (MBA)

$5,790,000

Wyeth

Bernard Poussot

Business and Finance

Not available (newly appointed)

Until next time….

Good Luck and Good Job Hunting!!!!!!!!