"Stop Puppy Fraud" Website Launched

As you may know, BioJobBlogger was recently sued for defamation, invasion of privacy and punitive damages by Donna Roberts and Dawn Abrams two so called dog breeder.

To that end, a group of concerned dog advocates and friends have created a website called Stop Puppy Fraud to help to raise awareness about fraudulent dog breeders and to help raise money to defray legal expenses.

P.S. The dog in the pic is Moose-- a two to five year old mixed breed dog (misrepresented as a 9 month old Havanese purebred) rescued from Abrams and Roberts.

Thankfully, he is in much better shape today than in the pic (taken less than a week after we purchased him from Dawn Abrams) with bilateral ear infections, a fulminant urinary tract infection that prevented him from urinating and necrotic gums and rotting front teeth that were ultimately saved by a veterinary dental expert).

Until next time...

Good Luck and Help Save the Puppies!!!!!!

Summertime Blues

Summer has finally arrived and everyone I know is kicking back, looking forward to their previously planned vacations and enjoying their four day (summer hours) work week. While many folks still have jobs, the unemployment rates are not dropping as quickly as anticipated and large numbers of layed-off and right-sized former life sciences employees are still without jobs. 

I recently checked the BioJobBlog archives and quickly realized that I have written close to 100 posts on how to craft an industrial strength resume, conduct a job search, prepare for a phone or face-to-face job interview, network and negotiate a job offer. To that end, I thought it might be informative and constructive to resurrect some of these older posts and re-assemble them into a thread that describes each step of the job hunting process. Also, as many of you may know, I was recently sued by an odious individual for invasion of privacy and defamation because I exposed her alleged illegal dog breeding and puppy mill ring. 

Consequently, much of my free time over the next two weeks will be spent on the case. That said, I will begin posting daily job hunting tips and advice on July 5, 2010.

I hope that my readers find this series useful. Also, I would like to hear from those of you who despise and abhor persons who mistreat and abuse animals and are willing to help me put my accuser out of business for good!!!!!!!!

Until next time...

Good Luck and Good Job Hunting!!!!!!!!!

 

Donna Roberts Supporter Says: "This is America and people can do what they like with their pets.!"

Because I subscribe to transparency, full disclosure and the notion that most stories have two sides, I felt that it was only appropriate to post a comment sent to me by a an ardent Donna Roberts supporter who believes that she and her ring of dog-grifting associates are innocent and have been unduly harmed and wronged by my blog posts.  

From: notifications@lexblog.com <notifications@lexblog.com>
Subject: [Bio Job Blog] New Comment Posted to 'Donna Roberts Responds: I am Innocent of All Charges--The Rest of the World is Guilty'
To: cmintz@bioinsights.com
Date: Monday, May 3, 2010, 1:40 PM

An unapproved comment has been posted on your blog Bio Job Blog, for entry
#267937 (Donna Roberts Responds: I am Innocent of All Charges--The Rest of
the World is Guilty). You need to approve this comment before it will
appear on your site.

IP Address: 68.39.22.204
Name: Edward
Email Address: njlaw4u@yahoo.com
URL:
Comments:

Mr. Mintz,
   I have read all your posts and I have read all the comments posted.    I
have yet to read Mrs. Roberts threaten you, she is just trying to correct
the lies you have been spreading about her and her family.  She is a mother
protecting her children and grandchildren. It is you sir that has
threatened them and have exposed the children of this family to possible
harm by posting addresses.  Several sex offenders live in their area and
you just pointed out targets for them, shame on you.  If you have a problem
with Donna Roberts then attack Donna Roberts do not involve innocent
children.  If you had a problem with Dawn Abrams then take her to court, if
she sold you sick dogs that would be the legal thing to do but she didn't
sell you sick dogs and she didn't jump when you threatened her so you are
mad.  Mr. Mintz call it what you want, harassing this family will only end
you up in court.  This family has endured everything you have thrown at
them, every agency you have called on them and every person you have
poisoned by your blog.    I say it's enough, you are not going to stop this
family from having their dogs and rightfully so. This is America, home of
the FREE.  They are not hurting anyone, all the pups are sold with the
backing of the NJ Lemon Law for Animals and in my opinion, knowing that
their every move is being watched and monitored by you this would be the
safest place to buy a puppy from because God Forbid they sell any pup with
a problem, you would have it all over. So I am sure they are being extra
careful. I also did some checking, Mrs. Roberts is truthful.  No complaints
have been lodged against any of her children or her grandchildren. I called
the Burlington Consumer Affairs Dept and they have no complaints for any of
them except for Donna Roberts made by Barbara Harra and Laurie Pallantee in
2007. That was 3 years ago and nothing since, does that sould like a
horrible puppymill breeder. My God Man, LET IT GO !!!!!!

BioJobBlogger Response:  I won't let it go because of all of  the dogs Donna and her gang have harmed or mistreated and the pain that they have wrought on innocent and unsuspecting persons who simply wanted to buy a healthy and loving pet!

Until next time...

Good Luck and Good Dog Grifter Hunting!!!!!!!!

Why Dogs Eat Grass

I have always wondered why dogs eat grass and other plants. After all there isn’t much nutritional value in them. An old wives tale or urban legend (more politically correct) suggests that dogs may eat grass because they are either sick or not feeling well. And, because of the grass eating they vomit afterwards to feel better.

It was just the other day that I asked my wife if she knew why dogs eat grass. Much to my surprise, the next day I came across an article in this month’s edition of the Healthy Pet Magazine that describes a study conducted by three veterinarians to find an answer to this vexing question. (Apparently, there isn’t even a consensus among veterinarians regarding the grass eating phenomenon).

The authors of the study conduct three surveys to get to the bottom of this conundrum. First they asked 25 veterinary students who owned dogs about their dogs’ grass eating habits. All reported that their dogs ate grass, didn’t exhibit an overt signs of illness and 8% said their dogs regularly vomited after afterwards

Next, they surveyed 47 dog owners that brought their dogs to veterinary hospital for outpatient care. Among this group, 70% per cent reported that their dogs ate plants mostly grass. Of the 37 owners that answered questions about their dog’s behavior before and after eating plants, 4 dogs showed signs of illness and only 6 vomited.

Finally, they conducted a web survey among dog owners whose dogs regularly eat plants or grass. Based on responses from 1,571 dog owners they found:

  • 68% of dogs ingested plants or grass on a daily or weekly basis
  • 8% of dogs frequently show signs of illness prior to eating plants or grass
  • 22% of dogs regularly vomit after eating plants
  • Of the plant eating dogs, younger dogs eat more than older dogs
  • There is no relationship between plant or grass eating and dietary habits (table scraps vs dog food) or fiber deficiencies

The bottom line: plant eating is a common behavior in normal dogs unrelated to illness and most dogs do not vomit afterwards. Vomiting seems to be incidental rather caused by plant eating.

This once again begs the question—why do dogs eat grass? The authors of the study posit that plant or grass eating may be a behavioral trait inherited from wolves (the dog’s ancestor) that may have possibly helped to purge the animals of parasites. In other words, nobody really knows the reason why dogs eat plants and grass.

Don’t you just love science? You get some answers to seemingly simple questions which, in turn, spawn new ideas and additional experimentation. I knew there had to be a reason why scientists decided to sequence the dog genome! Anybody up for finding the canine grass-eating gene(s)?

Until next time…

Good Luck and Good Job Hunting!!!!!!!!

 

Dawn Abrams and Donna Roberts Continue to Scam Would Be Dog Owners

Despite court rulings, statewide investigations and public humiliation, Dawn Abrams and Donna Roberts continue to scam would be dog owners who want to buy puppies and give them good homes. 

A would be client sent me an e-mail message claiming that he was duped by the dynamic duo of sleaze because he didn’t research them in advance. Like me, he believed that these people were legitimate before it was too late. 

According to his message, these brazen and seemingly unrelenting grifters are currently doing business as:

Havanese Puppies Ready to Go (Danalyn, Medford/Vincentown)

537 Oakshade Rd., Vincentown, NJ 08008

609-346-6571

The Vincentown address is where Dawn Roberts lives in a run down farm house with 6 children. Apparently, Donna Roberts is using one of her tried and true aliases Marie Dueben (who I think is the name of one of her ex-husband’s wives). The person who wrote to me contends that these odious individuals are also doing business as My Cute Muppets on the Puppyfind website.

Despite repeated unsuccessful attempts to shut Dawn and Donna down, these amoral and unethical scumbags continue to dupe innocent, unsuspecting would-be dog owners. It is a shame that these jerks are not big enough criminals to make it onto the New Jersey State radar of people to put away. But, as I always say, what goes around comes around.

And I hope that Dawn and Donna’s days of reckoning comes around sooner rather than later.

Until next time…

Keep the faith; there is justice in the world! 

 

Cruel and Unusual Punishment: "Debarking" Your Dog

There was a very disturbing article on the front page of today’s New York Time about an increasingly popular practice of debarking dogs by people who live in urban areas like New York City. Debarking is accomplished by severing a dog’s vocal cords. The practice may be more widespread than reported because of nuisance pet policies imposed on apartment owners by co-op boards in the city. According to the article, the surgery usually leaves the animal with something between a wheeze and a squeak in lieu of a bark.               

While I am not a card-carrying animal rights activist and find excessive barking annoying, I am a dog owner and a biologist who strongly believes in evolution. And, as far as I am concerned, if dogs weren’t meant to bark they wouldn’t! Taking away a dog’s only means of verbal communication (one of my dogs “whines” when she needs to go out and the doggy door is shut) is, in my opinion, detrimental to a dog’s physical and behavioral well being. As one animal behaviorist said in the article:

“Dogs are usually barking because of some frustration. It’s frustrating to be a sheepdog with no sheep. What I’d be concerned about is, if you are debarking a dog and it has an underlying happiness.”

Proponents of the procedure say that it is a harmless procedure and dogs that have been debarked don’t act any differently than they did before the operation. Luckily, many younger veterinarians have deemed that the surgery unnecessary and unethical and refuse to perform it.

My first experience with debarking was after I inadvertently purchased my two dogs from the daughter of a notorious and nefarious New Jersey-based puppy mill breeder. I learned that it is not uncommon among puppy mill owners, to silence their dogs to prevent detection by authorities by shoving metal rebar down their throats. The repeated assaults on a dog’s vocal cords caused scarring and sometimes rupture which, in turn, renders the animal unable to bark. Imagine my outrage when I read that some veterinarians knowingly and willingly perform this surgery because pet owners requested that it be done!

I think the practice of debarking is repugnant, reprehensible and not justified in any circumstances. If your dog has a barking problem, hire an animal behaviorist or call Cesar Milan, aka the Dog Whisperer. It is likely there is an underlying behavioral problem or cause of the problem that can be fixed by behavior modification or pharmacological interventions. Debarking surgery is a convenient and facile solution for pet owners who say they love their dogs but are unwilling to spend the time and effort required to solve the problems. 

In conclusion, if dogs weren’t meant to bark then they would not have when they first appeared on the planet!!!

Until next time...

Good Luck and Don't Forget to Hug Your Puppy Today!!!!

Share/Bookmark

 

MRSA in the News Again: Another Misleading Report

Last week, I took a group of Seattle researchers to task about issuing a press release about isolating methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from sand samples taken from public beaches in Washington State. Their findings were neither remarkable nor news worthy and likely did more harm than good. Sadly, another article about MRSA—designed to alarm rather than inform and educate the American public—appeared in today’s Science section of the NY Times.

The article, “Ties to Pets Has Germ Jumping To and Fro” in which the word “germ” appeared several times, reports on the possible transmission of MRSA between humans and their pets, most notably dogs and cats. Much of the article focuses on the “strong link between animal to human transmission,” offers several frightening examples of serious zoonotic cases that have been recently reported and suggests that cats are eight times more likely than other pets to transmit MRSA to their owners. After reading the first part of the article, readers would rightfully believe that we are in the midst of a massive zoonotic MRSA epidemic with family pets at its epicenter.  However, on the second page of the article the author mentions an epidemiological survey study conducted by Dr. J. Scott Weese, a veterinarian from the University of Guelph in Ontario Canada which showed  that only “two to three percent of pets carry MRSA on their fur or skin or in their saliva.” Further, the study suggests that healthy animals that are transiently colonized by MRSA eliminate them “in a manner of weeks.” Compare the 2 to 3 per cent carrier rate in pets with an almost 70% human carriage rate of MRSA. While I am a PhD-trained infectious disease microbiologist, I don’t think it requires a PhD to quickly realize that pets really aren’t a major source or cause of MRSA infections for humans. That said, raising awareness among veterinarians about MRSA might aid in the development of appropriate disease surveillance, diagnostic testing, andinfection control to lessen the impact of MRSA on smallanimals.

I have no doubt that many people will look at and possibly treat their pets differently after reading the Times article. Further, many will unnecessarily spend money to have their pets tested for the presence or absence of MRSA. While informing the American public that pets (like humans) might unknowingly transmit MRSA is a good thing, turning the rare transmission of MRSA from animals to humans into a major epidemiological brou-ha-ha is misleading, scientifically disingenuous and reckless. Good journalism should inform and educate, not alarm and frighten people by presenting misleading and wrong-headed information. 

Until next time....

Good Luck and Good petting your pets (it will do more good than harm)

 SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

The Dark Underside of New Jersey Dog Breeders: Revisited

For the past year or so, I have been dealing with Donna Roberts, a so-called dog breeder who recently was convicted in New Jersey on three counts of animal cruelty. Ms Roberts recently contacted me because I chose not to post several of her most recent vitriolic and abusive rants against people who maintain that she is less than scrupulous.

In case you are interested, I didn’t post her most recent comments (like I have in the past) because I am frankly bored with them. That said, when Ms. Roberts has something honest to say, I will gladly publish her comments. I suspect that it will be a cold day in hell before I do that!

If you would like to contact Ms. Roberts directly --to hear what she has to say--please contact her a shadyoakhavs@yahoo.com  I am sure that she would love to  hear from you!

 

The Dark Underside of New Jersey Dog Breeders: Genetic Testing Results Are In!

 As you may recall, I purchased two dogs, a 10 week old Havanese puppy and a supposed 9- month old male Havanese “rescue puppy” named Marcus (now called Moose, see pic) from a New Jersey dog breeder named Dawn aka Grace Abrams. From the outset, we had suspicions about Moose’s age and true heritage. Our suspicions were heightened after our veterinarian announced that Moose was much older than 9 months and that he was suffering from ear and urinary tract infections, two types of intestinal worms and had 4 loose teeth because of periodontal disease. Also, Moose didn’t look anything like Sandy.  Based on photos we found online, Moose looked more like a Maltese than a Havanese—something that was verified by casual conversations with Maltese owners and many veterinary professionals. 

Because of my molecular biology training, I wondered whether a genetic test, similar to those used for human genetic testing, was commercially available for dogs. Much to my delight, I discovered that Mars Veterinary had developed a test called the Wisdom Panel that can be use to analyze and verify or refute the lineage of over 135 breeds of dogs. Because of our growing suspicions, my wife and I decided to have both of our dogs tested to verify their breed designations. We received the Wisdom Panel results for Sandy and Moose last week. Like other things in life there is some good news and some bad news. First, let me give you the good news.

The Wisdom Panel results revealed that Sandy is truly a Havanese (there were negligible traces of other breeds but they were consistent with the Havanese breed as a whole). Now, the bad news (which is actually good news for us). Moose the supposed 9-month old Havanese is in reality a mixed breed dog whose lineage consists of equal amounts of Havanese, Miniature Poodle, Shih Tzu and Maltese. This result coupled with the bogus Havanese pedigree papers that Ms. Abrams gave us when we purchased Moose, suggests that Ms. Abrams, who claims to be an experienced Havanese breeder, likely committed fraud when she sold him to us. After all, how could an experienced Havanese breeder like Dawn, who has been selling “Havanese” puppies for the past few years, mistake a 2 year old mixed breed dog for a 9-month old Havanese puppy?  

Despite mounting evidence against Dawn and her mother, Donna Roberts, they continue to sell dogs to unsuspecting would-be pet owners. With this in mind, I recently came across several new ads likely posted by Dawn and Donna using old and sometimes new aliases to sell their dogs!

http://www.breeders.net/detail.php?id=210048 

http://www.breeders.net/detail.php?id=143532

http://www.breeders.net/detail.php?id=210055

http://www.breeders.net/detail.php?id=21004

Until next time….

Good Luck and Good Job Hunting!!!!!

 

New Jersey Dog Breeder Darkside: Redux

Since the original post about bogus dog breeding in New Jersey, I received several comments from the alleged breeder(s)" who sold us our dogs Moose and Sandy.  I invite you to read them---they are very interesting to say to least. 

A person who became involved with our little doggy drama sent me a link to a company that does genetic testing verify or refute canine breed or pedigree claims.  We are going to have both of our dogs tested.  We suspect that Moose is not a havanese as billed but a maltese/bichon or maybe a maltese/havanese mix . As luck would have it, we met both a maltese and bichon during our trip to Moosehead Lake in Maine and learned alot about both breeds. Moose looks alot like a maltese but unlike pure malteses who are all white, he has quite a bit of cream coloring in his coat.

The jury is still out on Sandy (who we bought as a 10 week old puppy) is suppose to be a full-blooded havanese female.  She looks like havanese that we have seen in photos, but given the circumstances we are not certain that she is really what she is supposed to be!

If either or both of the dogs are not what they were claimed to be in the pedigree papers that we received, it is our belief that we have a good case of fraud or at the very least misrepresentation on our hands.  As most of us know, DNA doesn't lie!  Who says that Cary Mullis didn't deserve to win the Nobel Prize for developing PCR!!!!!!!!!

Please read the back story (see below) about our journey into the underbelly of bogus dog breeding in the Garden State!!!

Original Post

Several months ago, my wife and daughter saw a “really adorable” dog at a school fundraising event.  My wife asked the owner what type of dog it was and she was told “it is a Havanese.” Neither my wife nor I had heard of the breed before but, after doing some Internet research we learned that it is related to the Bichon and is called Havanese because the breed originated in Cuba. As former residents of Miami (we met there) and familiar with all things Cuban my wife and I decided to buy a Havanese puppy for our daughter and two sons (they had been vigorously campaigning for a dog for the past few years).

The first step in our search was to Google the breed and see whether there were any Havanese breeders in New Jersey. Much to our delight, we found five Havanese breeders in New Jersey and no fewer than three were in driving distance from our home. To make a long story short, we purchased a wonderful 10-week old Havanese puppy called Sandy from a private breeder named Grace Abrams who runs Havanese 4Ever in Vincentown, NJ. A couple of days after we brought Sandy home, my wife took her to her first veterinary appointment and disappointed to learn that Sandy had serious case of ear mites and a round worm infestation. While we concerned, we didn’t think much of this (although Grace had certified that the puppy was healthy and disease free) and went on with our newly-minted Havanese existence.

After living with Sandy for several months (and spending way too much money to build a fence for one dog), my wife and I decided that Sandy needed a companion to play with. Imagine our delight, when we saw that Grace was looking for a home for a young, Havanese male that she had recently acquired “from a couple relocating from North Carolina to New York City.”  After seeing the ad on Grace’s website, my wife, Sandy and I drove back to Vincentown examine the “9 month old healthy Havanese male” that was dumped on Grace’s door step. Grace informed us that she had been caring for the dog for two weeks and that he was filthy and in very bad condition when she first got him. Without any hesitation, we adopted the dog (Moose) for $400 (after Grace knocked off $150 because of the ear mites and worms with Sandy) and thought all was right with the world. We also received some nominal paperwork including Moose’s veterinary records, his pedigree papers and a receipt.

A couple of days after we brought Moose home, my wife took him to the vet for a physical examination. Much to her dismay, the veterinarian told my wife that Moose was not 9 months old but closer to 3 years, had a bad case of gingivitis (and 4 loose teeth that needed to be pulled) and an ear and urinary tract infections. After receiving three frantic phone calls from my wife who was in tears, I contacted Grace and informed her that things were not right with Moose and that we wanted our money back. Again, to make a long story short, Grace refused to give us a refund unless we brought Moose back to her. Of course, we didn’t comply and Moose (who is a wonderful, loyal and sweet dog) is now an official member of the family. That said, with the help of a pet advocacy organization, NJCAPSA which has been investigating puppy mill fraud in NJ, we learned that Grace Abrams is a member of a notorious ring of South Jersey dog grifters run by her mother Donna Roberts who in 2007 was found guilty under NJ Statute 4:22-26L on three of five counts of animal cruelty.

Grace aka Dawn Abrams and her mother Donna Roberts purportedly purchases puppies from Pennsylvania Amish and Mennonite puppy mills (allegedly run by a nefarious character named David Zimmerman) and sell them from Boston to Washington DC as well as locally in New Jersey. Although never convicted of fraud, numerous complaints have been filed against Donna and Grace claiming that they supplied customers with falsified veterinary certificates and bogus AKC or other registration papers. Sometimes, Robert Cohen, an odious licensed New Jersey veterinarian, issues “health certificates” for Donna/Dawn’s puppies and so-called “rescue animals”. Not surprisingly, Cohen’s name appeared in court documents in several cases of fraud brought against Donna Roberts.

Because of her convictions, Donna Roberts keeps a low profile. Grace/Dawn Abrams is the front person but her mother Donna Roberts actually calls all the shots. Over the years, Donna and Grace/Dawn have sold dogs under the following kennel names: 1) Dark Moon Havanese, Shamong, NJ,  2) Shady Oaks Havanese, Howell NJ, 3) Kissy Face Havanese, Lakewood NJ, 4) Havanese Breeze, Medford NJ, 4) Havanese 4U, Indian Mills, NJ and 5) Havanese 4ever, Vincentown, NJ. Be warned that they also advertise Havanese and other breeds on PetFinder, Craig’s List, Breeders.net, Doggie.com and others pet sites where there are no ad listing charges.

Also, be aware that they are alleged to sell dogs under the following names or aliases:

Dee Woods

Dee Roberts

Gloria Anderson

Donna Anderson

Rachel Anderson

Donna Marie Dueben

Donna Truex

Robin Lewis

Robin Anderson (Donna Robert’s sister)

Marci Jean - advertises under the same phone number as Shady Oak

Carol Lang

Grace Abrams - Havanese4ever

Paul - Shady Oak Havanese

Marci Dueben - Havana Breeze Havanese

After we learned about Donna and her co-conspirators, my wife and I (who is an attorney) thoroughly examined the papers that we received for Sandy and Moose from Grace Abrams. Sure enough, no fewer than five of their aliases appeared in various capacities (e.g., owner, seller, breeder etc) throughout our documents. Further, Robert Cohen was the veterinarian of record who signed all of Sandy’s veterinary certificates. Although Moose was billed as a 9 month Havanese we now believe that he is a 2 year old Bichon, Shih Tzu or a mix. We think that he was probably a former breeder dog in a PA puppy mill (since he was not neutered). Sandy is likely a true Havanese but I wouldn’t be surprised that turns out not to be the case.  

I wrote this piece because the emotional and gut-wrenching experience that my family and I have gone through has had a profound effect on me. To that end, I am going to do everything possibly to shut down the operations run by Donna Roberts, Grace/Dawn Abrams and their co-conspirators.  Any suggestions, ideas, help (especially Internet/technology-wise) on how to put these people and their ilk out of business would be greatly appreciated.  Please feel free to repost this piece on any appropriate pet and dog breeder sites or blogs.

Until next time….

Good Luck and Good Puppy Hunting!!!!